If you have made comments on the Age of Autism article Olmsted on Autism: Day in Court, please copy your comment here, including the date and time you posted at AoA.
Olmsted reported on the oral arguments before the Court of Appeals in the Cedillo case.
The problem with the article is that it neglects to point out that there is virtually zero chance of the decision of the Special Master being reversed.
A normal organization, interested in keeping its members up to date, would have included this information.
To learn why the chances of a successful appeal are virtually zero, see my take at http://vaccineswork.blogspot.com/2010/06/appeals-wont-succeed-olmsted-isnt.html
June 11 8:20 pm.
ReplyDeleteOlmsted reported on the oral arguments before the Court of Appeals in the Cedillo case.
The problem with the article is that it neglects to point out that there is virtually zero chance of the decision of the Special Master being reversed.
A normal organization, interested in keeping its members up to date, would have included this information.
To learn why the chances of a successful appeal are virtually zero, see my take at
http://vaccineswork.blogspot.com/2010/06/appeals-wont-succeed-olmsted-isnt.html